Comments on: Video Case Study - YouTube Video Ranks In The Top 5 http://www.netbusinessblog.com/video-case-study-youtube-video-ranks-in-the-top-5/ Work from Home and Run an Online Business / Over 400+ Articles Tue, 07 Oct 2008 07:07:57 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: Case Study Update - My YouTube Video Finally Made Top 10 » Net Business Blog http://www.netbusinessblog.com/video-case-study-youtube-video-ranks-in-the-top-5/#comment-27410 Case Study Update - My YouTube Video Finally Made Top 10 » Net Business Blog Sun, 29 Jul 2007 18:36:05 +0000 http://www.netbusinessblog.com/video-case-study-youtube-video-ranks-in-the-top-5/#comment-27410 [...] the video case study 11 days [...] […] the video case study 11 days […]

]]> By: Oleg http://www.netbusinessblog.com/video-case-study-youtube-video-ranks-in-the-top-5/#comment-24734 Oleg Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:29:33 +0000 http://www.netbusinessblog.com/video-case-study-youtube-video-ranks-in-the-top-5/#comment-24734 Yeah sorry. My bad. I somehow read from the post that this search term isn't almost searched at all. My Mind plays sometimes tricks on me. But 160 searches a month are still good traffic to rank for if it's easy. I'm taking my "Now what?" question back. I probably know what to do with it. Thanks:) Yeah sorry. My bad. I somehow read from the post that this search term isn’t almost searched at all. My Mind plays sometimes tricks on me.
But 160 searches a month are still good traffic to rank for if it’s easy. I’m taking my “Now what?” question back. I probably know what to do with it. Thanks:)

]]> By: Dee http://www.netbusinessblog.com/video-case-study-youtube-video-ranks-in-the-top-5/#comment-24727 Dee Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:21:21 +0000 http://www.netbusinessblog.com/video-case-study-youtube-video-ranks-in-the-top-5/#comment-24727 I don't see Google putting YouTube videos in a sandbox because they own YouTube. However, if internet marketers start spamming YouTube, Google might have to sandbox them. I don’t see Google putting YouTube videos in a sandbox because they own YouTube. However, if internet marketers start spamming YouTube, Google might have to sandbox them.

]]> By: Dee http://www.netbusinessblog.com/video-case-study-youtube-video-ranks-in-the-top-5/#comment-24726 Dee Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:17:53 +0000 http://www.netbusinessblog.com/video-case-study-youtube-video-ranks-in-the-top-5/#comment-24726 We'll try a more competitive phrase next time. By the way, <a href="http://www.netbusinessblog.com/2007/07/13/prep-for-video-case-study/" rel="nofollow">people actually search for this phrase</a>. We’ll try a more competitive phrase next time.

By the way, people actually search for this phrase.

]]> By: Dee http://www.netbusinessblog.com/video-case-study-youtube-video-ranks-in-the-top-5/#comment-24725 Dee Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:16:03 +0000 http://www.netbusinessblog.com/video-case-study-youtube-video-ranks-in-the-top-5/#comment-24725 How is this a useless ranking? The keyword phrase has <a href="http://www.netbusinessblog.com/2007/07/13/prep-for-video-case-study/" rel="nofollow">some search volume</a>. How is this a useless ranking? The keyword phrase has some search volume.

]]> By: Florchakh http://www.netbusinessblog.com/video-case-study-youtube-video-ranks-in-the-top-5/#comment-24451 Florchakh Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:11:56 +0000 http://www.netbusinessblog.com/video-case-study-youtube-video-ranks-in-the-top-5/#comment-24451 And what do you think, is there a chance that folks from Google won't set some sort of sandbox for youtube videos, too? I would like to be first for "Paris Hilton", it might be pretty easy, if there's no cover... You know what I mean! And what do you think, is there a chance that folks from Google won’t set some sort of sandbox for youtube videos, too? I would like to be first for “Paris Hilton”, it might be pretty easy, if there’s no cover… You know what I mean!

]]> By: chatmasta http://www.netbusinessblog.com/video-case-study-youtube-video-ranks-in-the-top-5/#comment-24422 chatmasta Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:36:50 +0000 http://www.netbusinessblog.com/video-case-study-youtube-video-ranks-in-the-top-5/#comment-24422 Now do it for a competitive phrase that people actually search for. Now do it for a competitive phrase that people actually search for.

]]> By: Matt Jones http://www.netbusinessblog.com/video-case-study-youtube-video-ranks-in-the-top-5/#comment-24401 Matt Jones Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:00:09 +0000 http://www.netbusinessblog.com/video-case-study-youtube-video-ranks-in-the-top-5/#comment-24401 Thats pretty impressive stats! My old blog went for $1000 after 3 months... Thats pretty impressive stats! My old blog went for $1000 after 3 months…

]]> By: 45n5 http://www.netbusinessblog.com/video-case-study-youtube-video-ranks-in-the-top-5/#comment-24399 45n5 Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:56:20 +0000 http://www.netbusinessblog.com/video-case-study-youtube-video-ranks-in-the-top-5/#comment-24399 thanks for the mention Dee. It's still strange I think that the url link to the youtube video showed up and not the universal search where the video appears in the search results. Still a mystery to me how to get the video to show up in the results. thanks again for the mention. mark thanks for the mention Dee. It’s still strange I think that the url link to the youtube video showed up and not the universal search where the video appears in the search results. Still a mystery to me how to get the video to show up in the results.

thanks again for the mention.

mark

]]> By: Oleg http://www.netbusinessblog.com/video-case-study-youtube-video-ranks-in-the-top-5/#comment-24374 Oleg Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:47:32 +0000 http://www.netbusinessblog.com/video-case-study-youtube-video-ranks-in-the-top-5/#comment-24374 You can rank with everything(blog, picture, video, even a comment) for a search term that is long. You proved that useless rankings are easy to achieve, which everybody else already knew. Now what? You can rank with everything(blog, picture, video, even a comment) for a search term that is long. You proved that useless rankings are easy to achieve, which everybody else already knew. Now what?

]]>