<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Optimizing Images for SE Traffic - Is it Worth it?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.netbusinessblog.com/optimizing-images-for-se-traffic-is-it-worth-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.netbusinessblog.com/optimizing-images-for-se-traffic-is-it-worth-it/</link>
	<description>Net Business Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: erpoftjbpw</title>
		<link>http://www.netbusinessblog.com/optimizing-images-for-se-traffic-is-it-worth-it/#comment-20349</link>
		<dc:creator>erpoftjbpw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 15:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbusinessblog.com/2007/01/31/optimizing-images-for-se-traffic-is-it-worth-it/#comment-20349</guid>
		<description>Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! zcqyxmouwh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! zcqyxmouwh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Coddington</title>
		<link>http://www.netbusinessblog.com/optimizing-images-for-se-traffic-is-it-worth-it/#comment-1390</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Coddington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 05:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbusinessblog.com/2007/01/31/optimizing-images-for-se-traffic-is-it-worth-it/#comment-1390</guid>
		<description>That's absolutely true Ajith.  But the point of SEO is to get the visitors there (especially targeted visitors) and hope that a fraction of them stick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s absolutely true Ajith.  But the point of SEO is to get the visitors there (especially targeted visitors) and hope that a fraction of them stick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Coddington</title>
		<link>http://www.netbusinessblog.com/optimizing-images-for-se-traffic-is-it-worth-it/#comment-1389</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Coddington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 05:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbusinessblog.com/2007/01/31/optimizing-images-for-se-traffic-is-it-worth-it/#comment-1389</guid>
		<description>I use my basic AWStates - it tells me who got to my site via Google image search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use my basic AWStates - it tells me who got to my site via Google image search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajith</title>
		<link>http://www.netbusinessblog.com/optimizing-images-for-se-traffic-is-it-worth-it/#comment-1040</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 05:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbusinessblog.com/2007/01/31/optimizing-images-for-se-traffic-is-it-worth-it/#comment-1040</guid>
		<description>But image viewrs sometime wont notice your site they just save the image and get away</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But image viewrs sometime wont notice your site they just save the image and get away</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Links - 2/24/2007 &#187; Net Business Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.netbusinessblog.com/optimizing-images-for-se-traffic-is-it-worth-it/#comment-967</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Links - 2/24/2007 &#187; Net Business Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 02:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbusinessblog.com/2007/01/31/optimizing-images-for-se-traffic-is-it-worth-it/#comment-967</guid>
		<description>[...] Eli has posted up an article on Blue Hat SEO on how to deal with pesky hotlinkers. This is a great solution to the problem inherent in optimizing your images for SEO traffic. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eli has posted up an article on Blue Hat SEO on how to deal with pesky hotlinkers. This is a great solution to the problem inherent in optimizing your images for SEO traffic. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.netbusinessblog.com/optimizing-images-for-se-traffic-is-it-worth-it/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>John Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 18:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbusinessblog.com/2007/01/31/optimizing-images-for-se-traffic-is-it-worth-it/#comment-422</guid>
		<description>I notice that you include the alt attribute over all your links.  This is a good feature as it makes your site look more organized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I notice that you include the alt attribute over all your links.  This is a good feature as it makes your site look more organized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leroy Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.netbusinessblog.com/optimizing-images-for-se-traffic-is-it-worth-it/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>Leroy Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 22:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbusinessblog.com/2007/01/31/optimizing-images-for-se-traffic-is-it-worth-it/#comment-388</guid>
		<description>It's a hassle to make sure all your images have the necessary attributes, but if at the end of the day you get a few more visitors from it, then it's worth the trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a hassle to make sure all your images have the necessary attributes, but if at the end of the day you get a few more visitors from it, then it&#8217;s worth the trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Coddington</title>
		<link>http://www.netbusinessblog.com/optimizing-images-for-se-traffic-is-it-worth-it/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Coddington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 03:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbusinessblog.com/2007/01/31/optimizing-images-for-se-traffic-is-it-worth-it/#comment-362</guid>
		<description>Good link Allen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good link Allen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen.H</title>
		<link>http://www.netbusinessblog.com/optimizing-images-for-se-traffic-is-it-worth-it/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen.H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 23:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbusinessblog.com/2007/01/31/optimizing-images-for-se-traffic-is-it-worth-it/#comment-360</guid>
		<description>A post titled "&lt;a href="http://www.pearsonified.com/2007/01/get_53_percent_more_searches_with_one_tweak.php#more-247" rel="nofollow"&gt;Feeling Sandboxed? How You Can Get 53% More Searches with One Tweak&lt;/a&gt;" was recently posted at Pearsonified, it addresses the same topic as this post and includes more detailed advice for those looking into it.


Allen.H</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A post titled &#8220;<a href="http://www.pearsonified.com/2007/01/get_53_percent_more_searches_with_one_tweak.php#more-247" >Feeling Sandboxed? How You Can Get 53% More Searches with One Tweak</a>&#8221; was recently posted at Pearsonified, it addresses the same topic as this post and includes more detailed advice for those looking into it.</p>
<p>Allen.H</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://www.netbusinessblog.com/optimizing-images-for-se-traffic-is-it-worth-it/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 18:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbusinessblog.com/2007/01/31/optimizing-images-for-se-traffic-is-it-worth-it/#comment-358</guid>
		<description>Matt,

You're right.  Visitors are visitors regardless the number or where they come from, if they come then it's only going to benefit the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right.  Visitors are visitors regardless the number or where they come from, if they come then it&#8217;s only going to benefit the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
